As early as the 1960s, policymakers and experts
recommended that exam reforms be made a top priority if we were to improve the
country’s educational status and ensure better learning outcomes for students. Sadly,
seven decades since Independence, we still grapple with issues of rote memorisation,
narrow and textbook-driven teaching, and testing that is limited to assessing knowledge
and minimal skills. This is not to say not much has been done on this front.
advertisement
Many recommendations have been adopted and many more suggested in the NEP2020,
are being implemented with great diligence. These measures are not leading to desired
outcomes, and therefore, deserve closer scrutiny.
Many recommendations have been adopted and many more suggested in the NEP2020,
are being implemented with great diligence. These measures are not leading to desired
outcomes, and therefore, deserve closer scrutiny.
It is a fact that what gets tested gets taught. If we wish to change the way we teach and
create a generation of learners who not only have deep subject knowledge but can put that
knowledge to good use in life, have the right attitudes and values to be productive
members of progressive societies, then examinations must test knowledge, skills as well as
dispositions.
Therefore, consistent attempts have been made both at the Centre and state levels to
reform the question papers, ensuring that questions assessed not just content knowledge
but also higher- order thinking skills. A massive drive is on to build the capacity of exam
paper setters to create blueprints, devise marking schemes and design questions that can
accurately capture student learning in all domains.
In line with change management principles, it is key that these changes be shared with all
stakeholders to avoid taking them unawares in such a crucial matter as a Board exam.
Teachers and learners need to know the changes in the type and pattern of questions to
align their teaching and learning to attain the expected outcomes.
Unfortunately, this communication, more often than not, takes the conventional route of
creating question banks and model papers. This practice can be grossly deleterious to the
very purpose of bringing about these reforms.

https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/kerala-train-fire-suspect-shahrukh-saifi-changed-lifestyle-police-notes-recovered-2356524-2023-04-06?utm_source=articlepage&utm_medium=mustread&utm_campaign=recommendation
Despite taking concrete steps such as doing away with marks, introducing grades, and all
the rhetoric in the media, Board exams continue to be high stakes, with all the associated
malaise of stress, anxiety, fear, and frustration.It is extremely difficult to combat the
deep- rooted and compelling social lore that the Board occupies in our collective psyche.
As a result, the pressure to perform is extremely high — for both teachers and students.
When question banks and model papers are available, teachers feel compelled to focus on
practising and mastering model questions to help their students score high, at the expense
of time spent on deepening knowledge and building competencies over time.
Also, our attempts at creating ‘fair and equitable’ exams and curbing the
commercialization of education are foiled when new markets are created for the latest
model papers and question banks that are within reach of a privileged few. It also perpetuates the coaching culture that thrives on peoples’ desperation to give it all they
have to ace the Boards. Both these are damaging consequences that compromise the
validity and reliability of these exams.
Therefore, communicating exam reforms in a manner that is cognizant of how these
changes will impact classroom teaching, the learning process and social behaviour is
extremely critical to making them effective. We must strike the right balance between
making exams transparent yet unpredictable, to ensure that the education system can be
rid of reliance on memorisation.Until then, exam results will continue to be poor
predictors of success in life, and society will continue to value certificate over learning.